Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Thanks!
    PS: of course this will also improve the MDaemon's performance. Consider that MD would read the content of different smaller folders in stead of reading the content of a single big folder. I know that the file data would finish in a single "memory array", but the reading operation would be much faster.

    Thanks,
    Michele

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hi Arron, thank you for your answer.

    Well, it would not improve the performance of MDaemon itself, it will improve the performances of the system running MDaemon. For example, if you open Windows Explorer in a directory with 150'000 files it will look as hanged for seconds/minutes. Or if you want to copy or backup the content of a directory, and so on...

    The user does not even know about the problem, and I cannot push customers to organize their email folders according to the system performances or the problems that they cause if they keep their inbox full of messages.

    I hope I was explaining better the need which is at the base of the hint..

    Thanks,
    Michele

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base