307 results found

1. Add to Dynamic screen refused hosts

   We have a lot of hosts on Security Settings > Screen Host.

   For example we have *.dotmailer.com, *.pur?.net, *.getrespooonse.com, *.createsend.com and more. Basically all this big companies that pretend to send solicited bulk mail but all they do is send unsolicited bulk mail. Thanks to this entries we have reduces our incoming mail by 90%.

   The problem is this companies have loads of hosts and they try and try and try to send emails even when you reply with a 550 after the HELO several times.

   Since added all those hosts to Screen Host our number of SMTP sessions (in) has gone for 300 per hour to 3000 per hour!!!

   Our log files are full of 220 > HELO > 550 I thought, why don't you have an option to add to dynamic screen the refused hosts? That will stop all those incoming SMTP sessions that end with a 550 after the HELO.

   We have a lot of hosts on Security Settings > Screen Host.

   For example we have *.dotmailer.com, *.pur?.net, *.getrespooonse.com, *.createsend.com and more. Basically all this big companies that pretend to send solicited bulk mail but all they do is send unsolicited bulk mail. Thanks to this entries we have reduces our incoming mail by 90%.

   The problem is this companies have loads of hosts and they try and try and try to send emails even when you reply with a 550 after the HELO several times.

   Since added all those hosts to Screen Host our number of SMTP sessions (in)… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello David,

   Thank you for sharing your idea with us. It will be considered for future versions.

   One thing I would like to clarify though. Adding the IP addresses of connections that are blocked by host screening to the IP screening list won’t actually stop the incoming SMTP session. It will allow MDaemon to reject the connection more quickly, but all the resources needed to establish the connection are still used. Your suggestion would save MDaemon from having to do the PTR lookup on the IP address, if its enabled, and would cause connections to be logged in the screening log instead of in the inbound SMTP log.

   Thanks again for your suggestion,

   Arron

2. Ability to change the date format returned by $AR_START$ and $AR_END$

   Would be helpful to be able to control the format of the date returned by these macros.

   Thanks,

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello,

   Thank you for sharing your suggestion with us and my apologies for the delay in responding. The ability to control the date format returned by the $AR_START$ and $AR_END$ macros will be considered for future versions.

   Thanks again,
   Arron

3. Apply filters to existing messages

   After creating a filter have a Run Filter function (at least for the Inbox) to filter messages that pre-date the filter creation date.

   26 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello John,

   Thank you for sharing your idea to add the ability to apply filters to existing messages. It will be considered for future versions.

   Thanks again,

   Arron

4. mdaemon

   Auto Black Listing feature of the sender IP and auto reporting to SPAM COP.

   The problem with this is it is a manual process and not Automated and it should be. One big problem with MDaemon is your Black list feature only places the Domain address into the Black list. You are not providing a method of auto IP blocking.

   Also if the server is used for Gateway SPAM filtering which is what we do for customers there is not a quick way to show all email and then display the messages as shown below. In order to see the screen below you need to dig in the Queue area to locate this screen and the other issue is it fails to display the Sender IP address.

   You can right click on the message and select black list however it is only placing a useless name (fake name or email address) into the black list which will never be used again by the SPAM sender. You need to search the message just as SPAM COP does and locate the sending IP and issue this IP to the BLACK List. Also you should place the Name of the bogus domain and or IP next to it.

   We are aware that you could unintentionally block a valid email sender if the IP were for example coming from AOL. This is up to the ADMIN on if they want to block it or not but currently there is not a good method for blocking IP Addresses.

   This process could be automated and at the same time you Black List the IP it could also send ALTN the header and handle it the same way SPAM COP handles reported SPAM for members and or you could possible set up a way to report the message to SPAM COP.

   The 2 items - Black Listing IP and Reporting the sender as a SPAMMER are the ways we saw SPAM eliminated after using MDaemon for 15 or more years and running all your regular methods which worked poorly.

   Also by placing the Sending IP address into the queue below I can review the number of SPAM messages coming from a set of Servers and I can not tell this the way it displays the information currently. I would need to open each message and look through the message to locate the sending IP. Again there is no reason why you can not provide a way to display the sender IP and have the feature to Black List this IP of the selected messages.

   I would in many cases TAG multiple records which could then be black list all these IP addresses in a mater of seconds. To further supply a smart method of Rejected or Dropped messages can be placed into a simple LOG that can be quickly viewed. The idea here would be IP address which has been black listed and the sender Email that has been dropped. This allows us a way to see dropped IP and sender email domain addresses. I can then see from this log if a good person has been dropped verses the SPAMMER that come from the same sending system. I find that in most cases the method outlined in this document to be the best method of elimination of SPAM.

   Auto Black Listing feature of the sender IP and auto reporting to SPAM COP.

   The problem with this is it is a manual process and not Automated and it should be. One big problem with MDaemon is your Black list feature only places the Domain address into the Black list. You are not providing a method of auto IP blocking.

   Also if the server is used for Gateway SPAM filtering which is what we do for customers there is not a quick way to show all email and then display the messages as shown below. In order to see the… more

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   under review  ·  0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Whitelists for individual features.

   In addition to the global whitelist in SG, I would like to have individual whitelists for each feature. I may need to allow one person to bypass the antivirus or content filter or prevent them from being tarpitted. Currently I have now way of allowing this without bypassing everything by putting them in the whitelist.

   6 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  SecurityGateway  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello David,

   Thank you for sharing your suggestion to add a white list for individual features. It will be considered for future versions.

   Thanks again,

   Arron

6. Public folder move

   In OC if it is possible to block the displacement of Public folders.
   This is the main cause of error users.
   Thank you.

   21 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  MDaemon Connector  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello,

   Thank you for sharing your idea with us. Currently you can prevent a user from moving a public folder by removing their delete permissions. Improving upon this so that users can have access to delete messages but not access to move folders will be considered for future versions.

   Thanks,

   Arron

7. Backup during upgrade

   During an upgrade, like to 14.0.1, the auto backup that runs during the install only backs up the App and Spamassassin folders.
   However, depending on what is upgraded during the install of the new software, you may need other folders to roll back to the previous version, if an issue is found, such as Worldclient and Webadmin. Otherwise you need to either manually back these up prior to install or get them back from an alternative backup source.
   Would it be possible to add this functionality to the system to ensure the ability to swiftly and cleanly roll back if necessary?

   During an upgrade, like to 14.0.1, the auto backup that runs during the install only backs up the App and Spamassassin folders.
   However, depending on what is upgraded during the install of the new software, you may need other folders to roll back to the previous version, if an issue is found, such as Worldclient and Webadmin. Otherwise you need to either manually back these up prior to install or get them back from an alternative backup source.
   Would it be possible to add this functionality to the system to ensure the ability to swiftly and cleanly roll back if… more

   7 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello Pat,

   Thank you for submitting your idea to add the ability to backup other folders during the install of MDaemon. It will be considered for future versions.

   Thanks again,
   Arron

8. Outlook Plug-in or Method to Send to SpamLearn and NonSpamLearn

   Need an Outlook Plug-in or some easy method for users to send spam that has reached their inbox to send messages to the provided SpamLearn@ address. Likewise there needs to be an easy method to use the NonSpamLearn@. As another user posted, there is no option to flag these on the quaratine views. What is particularly disturbing is that there is no documented procedure for users to flag delivered messages as spam that I can see.

   12 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  SecurityGateway  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello Paul,

   Thank you for providing your feedback and ideas. We will look into improving the ability to classify messages as spam or non spam for future versions.

   Thanks,
   Arron

9. Show as Conversations Outlook 2010

   Please add support for the Show as Conversations view in Outlook 2010.

   50 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   5 comments  ·  MDaemon Connector  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello Kristian,

   Thank you for submitting your idea to add support for the show as conversation view in Outlook 2010. It will will be considered for future versions.

   Thanks,
   Arron

10. Exclude accounts from the option to disable accounts after X days of inactivity

    I have noticed one more issue which arises after enabling this option to disable accounts after 30 days.
    After enabling this option i noticed that the email ids created for notification purpose are also blocked. For instance: i have a Email ID created for firewall alerts and since no one logs in to this Email ID this Email ID is frequently getting disabled by this feature.
    I would also recommend to have a exclusion list for Email ID created only for notifications.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello,

    Thank you for sharing your idea with us, it will be considered for future versions.

    Arron

11. Integration with MailStore

    MailStore search integration - at least a quick link to MS Web search in header and ability to open attached EML's it returns when messages are restored. Ideally an integrated search bar.

    41 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  MDaemon Webmail  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello James,

    Thank you for submitting your idea integrate with MailStore. It will be considered for future versions.

    Arron

12. Stop senders sharing your email address with everybody they know

    A content filter that you can define a message as spam (and bounce it to the sender) if it contains more than 2-3 recipients in the TO or CC field.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello Dimitris,

    Thank you for sharing your idea to add a condition to the content filter that allows you to check the number of recipients in the To and/or CC field. This will be considered for future versions.

    Thanks,
    Arron

13. Please add "Remove option for Domain Signature duplication".

    If any email forwarded by the user the mdaemon duplicate the domain's signature as number of times email forwarded. Please resolve this issue or provide a way to I do this manually or from content filter. Sorry for bad English.

    13 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello,

    Thank you for sharing your idea to remove duplicated signatures. It will be considered for future versions.

    Thanks,

    Arron

14. Security Gateway - sending statistics report with domain name included

    Security Gateway sends statistics reports and only mentions the server name. If you have one domain to monitor then this is no issue. Monitoring multiple domains as administrator it would be nice to see which domain the report is about.
    In my case, I monitor multiple domains but only have one administrator selected so I get a per domain report.
    In this case you can see which domain needs attention most.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  SecurityGateway  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello,

    Thank you for your suggestion. We will look into adding the domain name to the statistics reports for future versions of SecurityGateway.

    Thanks again,

    Arron

15. Manage emails as tasks

    Provide a zero-inbox and task-based approach to managing emails. Support the GTD methodology (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done)

    29 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon Webmail  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello George,

    Thank you for sharing your idea to support the task based approach to managing emails. It will be considered for future versions.

    Arron

16. Send on Behalf Of with Permission Management

    Hello,
    It would be nice to be able to manage the permissions for sending on behalf of.
    Each user should be able to decide who can send on its behalf and who is not. With a management similar to that relating to permissions shared folders.
    Now every user can send on behalf of everyone and in my opinion is not correct

    67 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello Alessandro,

    Thanks you for sharing your idea. It will be considered for future versions of MDaemon. Currently, you can require users to send email using their email address by enabling the SMTP Authentication options for “Authentication is always required when mail is from local accounts” and “Authentication credentials must match those of the email sender”, however, with these options enabled there is not a way to allow one user to send on behalf of another user.

    Thanks,
    Arron

17. Copy content filter rule in WebAdmin should disable the new rule and place it just below the existing rule

    It would be great if the copy rule copied to just below the source rule (rather than the bottom of the list) and also set the resultant rule to disabled

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello,

    This will be considered for future versions.

    Thanks,

    Arron

18. Per user read/unread status

    I have been testing MDaemon & other email server software in order to put them into production in our office.

    MDaemon has two ways of sharing emails : Public folders & shared folders with their own ACLs. In public folders the flags can be either per user or shared flags with other users. If the flags are shared with other users, then the Read, Unread, Replied, Forwarded, etc. all status are shared with other users, this way one can know which emails have been replied or forwarded. However if the Public Folders are configured with Per User IMAP flag settings, then every user does get to know which emails are new and unread by him, but it does not reflect whether a particular email has been replied or forwarded by any of his colleague. What I am looking is for a situation where all flag status are shared between the users except for the read / unread status. This way every user will have a clear picture of the conversation as well as what mails are new to him. This is a feature that works well with other mail servers such as Axigen & Desknow, where all flags are shared except for read unread status which is configured on a per user basis.

    I have been testing MDaemon & other email server software in order to put them into production in our office.

    MDaemon has two ways of sharing emails : Public folders & shared folders with their own ACLs. In public folders the flags can be either per user or shared flags with other users. If the flags are shared with other users, then the Read, Unread, Replied, Forwarded, etc. all status are shared with other users, this way one can know which emails have been replied or forwarded. However if the Public Folders are configured with Per User IMAP flag settings,… more

    35 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Thank for your post. We’ll review these and possibly split them into different ideas to facilitate accurate voting and feedback.

19. calendar appointment participants

    Hello
    Inviting participants in calendar is not that easy. Would it be possible to invite participants directly from the appointment tab by entering the email address for instance (the email address could be suggested while entering the name)
    Thank you

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  MDaemon Webmail  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello Yorick,

    MDaemon 14.5.0 was updated to use auto-complete when adding attendees to a meeting invite. You still need to add attendees via the Attendees tab though so I am not marking the idea as complete.

    Thanks,
    Arron

20. Add Graphical Statistical Add-on for MDaemon

    I wish there was an Add-on for MDaemon that can Analyze the MDaemon Logs & give Administrator, Statistical information about E-mails like:

    1. Number of E-mail from/to a Box/Domain or Domains .
    2. Size of E-mails from/to a Box/Domain or Domains .
    3. Information regarding to Protocols ( Imap/Smtp/Pop3 ) .
    4. Statistics about How a E-mail Box worked by Send/Rec. E-mails .
    5. Latest information about Time/Date of Users E-mails .

    I think that, if Alt-n prepare this Add-on, it will be better than others 3'th Party Companies.

    53 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello,

    Reports have been added to MDaemon 13.6.0 for bandwidth usage, inbound vs. outbound messages, good vs. junk messages, inbound messages processed, top recipients by number of messages, top recipients by size, outbound messages processed, top spam sources, top recipients of spam, viruses blocked, and virus blocked by name.

    Thanks,
    Arron