175 results found

1. Zero Inbox Filtering (server-side)

   I have been using a service for a while that saves a lot of time by automatically filtering emails out of my inbox and into folders (it learns how I move emails to/from these folders). It would be really cool if MD could provide the same functionality to users. This raises productivity.

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello George,

   Thanks for sharing your idea for server side zero inbox filtering. We’ll consider this for future versions.

   Thanks,

   Arron

2. More detailed ACLs on Mailboxes

   It would be very comfortable and helpful, if ACLs on Mailboxes were more differentiated. Particulary a differentiation between mailbox owner and those who have additional access to that mailbox is important when it comes to critical operations like deleting a entries.

   Example:
   If a user (e.g. secretary) has the rights to add and delete entries in a mailbox of his directors or colleague, he can not only delete the contacts and appointments which he added to this mailbox, but also the contacts and appointments which were maintained by the mailbox owner.

   So for business use cases it would be a great improvement, if MDaemon would offer a more complex ACL-Model (like the possibilities of Outlook/Exchange).

   It would be very comfortable and helpful, if ACLs on Mailboxes were more differentiated. Particulary a differentiation between mailbox owner and those who have additional access to that mailbox is important when it comes to critical operations like deleting a entries.

   Example:
   If a user (e.g. secretary) has the rights to add and delete entries in a mailbox of his directors or colleague, he can not only delete the contacts and appointments which he added to this mailbox, but also the contacts and appointments which were maintained by the mailbox owner.

   So for business use cases it would be a… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello,

   Thank you for sharing your idea to expand the MDaemon ACLs. It will be considered for future versions of MDaemon.

   Thanks,

   Arron

3. Spam filter per domain

   It would be nice if the spam filter worked per domain rather than as a global setting.
   eg. We run multiple domains and one domain would like tighter spam filtering by adjusting the spam score parameters, however you can't do this without also affecting the other domains.

   5 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello Ryan,

   Thank you for sharing your suggestion to add per domain spam filter settings to MDaemon. Your idea will be considered for future versions of MDaemon.

   Thanks,

   Arron

4. Calendar Synchronization between servers

   I know a few have requested systems involving the Calendar, but may I also add this idea..

   It would be nice to have a Calendar system that I can synchronise between MDaemon Servers. We operate two sites and require a system where everybody can access the same corporate calendar system, which is proving difficult to sync through present methods.

   Many thanks!

   11 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello Matthew,

   Thanks you for sharing your idea to synchronize a calendar between servers. It will be considered for future versions of MDaemon.

   Thanks,
   Arron

5. Improve Dynamic Screening

   It would be great if we could block ips which are sending to unknown recipients or sending confirmed spam into a specified period of time.

   i.e. if one IP sends more than "X" confirmed spam mails in less than "Y" minutes, then block that IP for "Z" minutes.
   If one IP is proving email addresses, and causes "X" recipient unknown responses in less than "Y" minutes, then block that IP for "Z" minutes.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   4 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello,

   Thank you for sharing your idea with us.

   MDaemon is capable of blocking IPs that cause X recipient unknown responses. To configure this open MDaemon and go to Setup / Security / Dynamic Screening. Enter a value in the “Block IPs that cause this many failed RCPTs”

   MDaemon is not currently capable of blocking IPs that attempt to send more than X confirmed spam messages. This could be a dangerous feature if your spam filter were mis-configured but we will look into it further.

   Thanks,
   Arron

6. Domain autoresponders

   We run multiple domains on mdaemon, and would like the to implement a domain wide autoresponder when we have an annual shutdown, this is not possible at present so we have a rule in the content filter that sends a reply to all recieved e-mails over the shutdown, the problem with this is that if a response is sent to an email address that does not accept replies we get a mail back again saying the mail address does not accept replies, our rule sends the 'auto responder' response back again and it results in a ping pong match between mdaemon and the external mail address. It would be nice if there was an autoresponder that you could implement on a domain by domain basis in mdaemon that could resolve this and ignore also any autoresponders that a user may have setup on individual accounts

   We run multiple domains on mdaemon, and would like the to implement a domain wide autoresponder when we have an annual shutdown, this is not possible at present so we have a rule in the content filter that sends a reply to all recieved e-mails over the shutdown, the problem with this is that if a response is sent to an email address that does not accept replies we get a mail back again saying the mail address does not accept replies, our rule sends the 'auto responder' response back again and it results in a ping pong match between… more

   12 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   under review  ·  1 comment  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Dynamic mail forward to external host, Similar to Multipop

   Dynamic Mail forward to external host, similar to what is done in Multipop, ie based on the users POP access, can save bandwidth for those who forward mail to external host to read mail when outside the office.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   3 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello Mohandas,

   Thanks for sharing additional details with us.
   Your idea will be considered for future versions of MDaemon.

   Thanks,
   Arron

8. ComAgent: Save recipient list for group chats

   It would be nice to be able to save a recipient list for group chats so that instead of having to select each recipient every time you start a group chat you could select a pre-saved group to send the message to.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   4 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello Marco,

   No worries, I’m glad you like our Idea Engine. Thank you for following up with additional details. Your request will be considered for future versions of MDaemon.

   Thanks,

   Arron

9. Send on Behalf Of with Permission Management

   Hello,
   It would be nice to be able to manage the permissions for sending on behalf of.
   Each user should be able to decide who can send on its behalf and who is not. With a management similar to that relating to permissions shared folders.
   Now every user can send on behalf of everyone and in my opinion is not correct

   67 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   10 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

   Hello Alessandro,

   Thanks you for sharing your idea. It will be considered for future versions of MDaemon. Currently, you can require users to send email using their email address by enabling the SMTP Authentication options for “Authentication is always required when mail is from local accounts” and “Authentication credentials must match those of the email sender”, however, with these options enabled there is not a way to allow one user to send on behalf of another user.

   Thanks,
   Arron

10. ComAgent - Ability to send directly a screen snapshot

    We use ComAgent internaly between several services, somes of them have asked for a new feature in comAgent : it would be nice to be able to take and send directly a snapshot of the screen to a contact via IM.
    (like using the Capture tools of Windows 7).

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello Gary,

    Thank you for sharing your idea to have ComAgent be able to send images. It will be considered for future versions.

    Thanks,

    Arron

11. Add SMTP forward address verification for Gateways

    Currently, it is only possible to check recipients in Gateway domains against LDAP,Minger or File based recipient lists. It would be great if MDaemon supported SMTP based Call-Forward (lookahead) recipient address verification.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Thank you for your idea submission Aaron. We’ll review and consider the options for future development.

12. Per user read/unread status

    I have been testing MDaemon & other email server software in order to put them into production in our office.

    MDaemon has two ways of sharing emails : Public folders & shared folders with their own ACLs. In public folders the flags can be either per user or shared flags with other users. If the flags are shared with other users, then the Read, Unread, Replied, Forwarded, etc. all status are shared with other users, this way one can know which emails have been replied or forwarded. However if the Public Folders are configured with Per User IMAP flag settings, then every user does get to know which emails are new and unread by him, but it does not reflect whether a particular email has been replied or forwarded by any of his colleague. What I am looking is for a situation where all flag status are shared between the users except for the read / unread status. This way every user will have a clear picture of the conversation as well as what mails are new to him. This is a feature that works well with other mail servers such as Axigen & Desknow, where all flags are shared except for read unread status which is configured on a per user basis.

    I have been testing MDaemon & other email server software in order to put them into production in our office.

    MDaemon has two ways of sharing emails : Public folders & shared folders with their own ACLs. In public folders the flags can be either per user or shared flags with other users. If the flags are shared with other users, then the Read, Unread, Replied, Forwarded, etc. all status are shared with other users, this way one can know which emails have been replied or forwarded. However if the Public Folders are configured with Per User IMAP flag settings,… more

    35 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Thank for your post. We’ll review these and possibly split them into different ideas to facilitate accurate voting and feedback.

13. Add support for virtual folders, available via WorldClient, IMAP, OC, API

    At present, clients accessing the object base managed by MDaemon, can only see and are offered real and actual folders existing on the file system of the server. Add the ability to define virtual folders. There could be two kind of virtual folders: (A) those provided by MDaemon itself (say, the union of two or more real folders of the same type: messages, calendars, contacts etc.), and (B) those provided by plug-in libraries developed by ISV.

    Since MDaemon 13.0, with the introduction of generic file folders, a useful virtual folder would be a union of folders of different default tipe, which contain related pieces of information, but which we are forced to keep in different and independent folders due to the typed nature of MDaemon object base folders.

    At present, clients accessing the object base managed by MDaemon, can only see and are offered real and actual folders existing on the file system of the server. Add the ability to define virtual folders. There could be two kind of virtual folders: (A) those provided by MDaemon itself (say, the union of two or more real folders of the same type: messages, calendars, contacts etc.), and (B) those provided by plug-in libraries developed by ISV.

    Since MDaemon 13.0, with the introduction of generic file folders, a useful virtual folder would be a union of folders of different default tipe,… more

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Thank you for your idea Emanuele. We will explore this further and consider it for future planning.

14. Hijack detection operating for individual domains instead of server level

    The detection of the hijack accounts is a very useful feature. It would be more useful to run at the domain level rather than at the server level because different domains may have different SMTP settings

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello Massimo,

    Thank you for sharing your idea with us. We will consider implementing per domain hijack detection settings for future versions of MDaemon.

    Thanks,

    Arron

15. For public's folder, is there anyway to have only html links for files..

    Hello

    For public folder's Is there anyway, for next version of Mdaemon/oc to have a specific behaviour and "an option" for public folder's, (which contains mails) to have only link to attachments, they contained

    I'd like to publish some informatiion into public folders, but if i synchronise them into wan with OC, bandwith will not be enough, and all public data will be replicated to the pc's wan users.

    Publics folders can actually be used in LAN with OC, or Wan with OC with TSE and Citrix, but... not Wan with OC... or just also for few data like contacts or task.

    So it will be better to have special behaviour for publics folders with link to files. (links should be dynamics, as when we download the OC via lookout, because sometimes we use the private ip and sometimes the public).

    Regards

    Hello

    For public folder's Is there anyway, for next version of Mdaemon/oc to have a specific behaviour and "an option" for public folder's, (which contains mails) to have only link to attachments, they contained

    I'd like to publish some informatiion into public folders, but if i synchronise them into wan with OC, bandwith will not be enough, and all public data will be replicated to the pc's wan users.

    Publics folders can actually be used in LAN with OC, or Wan with OC with TSE and Citrix, but... not Wan with OC... or just also for few data like contacts… more

    0 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello Cyril,

    Thank you for sharing another great idea with us. Just so that everyone is aware the current documents folders in MDaemon cannot be viewed from OutlookConnector. Your request to support links to documents will be considered for future versions of MDaemon.

    Thanks,

    Arron

16. new user account - smarthost user name and password

    What about a button to verify the user specific smarthost credentials directly when entering them? No more need to search logs for related malfunctions ...

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello Erhard,

    Thank you for sharing your idea to add a an option to test the smart host credentials. We will consider it for future versions of MDaemon.

    Thanks,

17. Support for RFC 3030 (BYNARYMIME && CHUNKING)

    For better bandwidth management on transmissions of large attachments

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello,

    Thank you for your request to implement RFC 3030. It will be considered for future versions of MDaemon.

    Arron

18. Expire user accounts on specific date

    Ability to set a user/mailbox expiration date on a per user/per domain basis.

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    This will be considered for future versions of MDaemon.

19. Improve autoresponder

    User configurable from Worlclient if an autoresponder should be sent on every mail or only once a day.

    14 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello Verner,

    Thanks for submitting your idea. It will be considered for future versions of MDaemon and WorldClient.

    Thanks,

    Arron

20. Size restriction on ingoing/outgoing basis

    Currently there is a setting for restricting large message sizes, with an option for skipping this check for authenticated sessions.

    Can this be improved on to allow different configurable values for local domains, and everyone else. Effectively a different limit for authenticated sessions, rather than the existing bypass.

    It would be advantageous to limit the size of emails sent out, but not prevent larger ones from being received.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  MDaemon  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    under review  ·  AdminArron Caruth (VP of Product Development, Alt-N Technologies) responded

    Hello Tim,

    Thank you for submitting your idea, it will be considered for future versions.

    In case you are not aware similar functionality can be accomplished using the content filter, however, the server will need to accept the mail for processing. Then if the message was over the limit set the rule would need to delete the email and send a message back to the sender notifying them of the problem.