Skip to content

Tim Clarke

My feedback

4 results found

  1. 53 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hello,

    Reports have been added to MDaemon 13.6.0 for bandwidth usage, inbound vs. outbound messages, good vs. junk messages, inbound messages processed, top recipients by number of messages, top recipients by size, outbound messages processed, top spam sources, top recipients of spam, viruses blocked, and virus blocked by name.

    Thanks,
    Arron

    Tim Clarke supported this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tim Clarke supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tim Clarke commented  · 

    Different settings within a domain would also be useful.

    I have some users I trust not to get into problems if they receive spam email, and those that I am more wary about. I also have users who I know are more likely to receive the type of email that would generate a false positive when the threshold is set very low.

    It would be useful to have different settings within the domain, so that I can set a low threshold to trap and manually filter email for some users, without the inconvenience this provides to others. This would also provide spam filtering to the higher threshold users that would be missed by a white list entry.

    Two settings might be enough, but maybe this might be best implemented by setting thresholds against users groups, and providing a default if they don't match a group with a threshold set.

  3. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hello Tim,

    Thank you for submitting your idea, it will be considered for future versions.

    In case you are not aware similar functionality can be accomplished using the content filter, however, the server will need to accept the mail for processing. Then if the message was over the limit set the rule would need to delete the email and send a message back to the sender notifying them of the problem.

    Tim Clarke shared this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tim Clarke shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base